·
Sat Nov 14, 11:45 AM CT · SEC Network · FirstBank Stadium
Our call: Alabama by 18.2 · 89% pregame win chance
89%Our win chance11%
Our win chance: Alabama 89% · Vanderbilt 11% · experimental, see how it is tested
Model comparison
10 of 10 models favor Alabama
| Model | Says | Win chance | Use this |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Margin The Margin's model | Alabama by 29.2 | Alabama 98% | Use this |
| SRS Alabama +26.3 vs Vanderbilt -1.6 | Alabama by 25.4 | Alabama 97% | Use this |
| Sonny Moore Alabama +100.1 vs Vanderbilt +71.6 | Alabama by 24.5 | Alabama 96% | Use this |
| ESPN FPI Alabama +26.1 vs Vanderbilt +0.7 | Alabama by 22.9 | Alabama 95% | Use this |
| SP+ Alabama +22.7 vs Vanderbilt -1.5 | Alabama by 21.7 | Alabama 94% | Use this |
| Market the market's pregame margin | Alabama by 19.5 | Alabama 92% | Use this |
| Our model · experimental Alabama +24.1 vs Vanderbilt +3.7 | Alabama by 17.9 | Alabama 90% | Use this |
| Sagarin Alabama +92.2 vs Vanderbilt +73.0 | Alabama by 16.6 | Alabama 88% | Use this |
| Elo Alabama 1984 vs Vanderbilt 1544 | Alabama by 15.1 | Alabama 86% | Use this |
| Record Vanderbilt 4-5, Alabama 7-2 | Alabama (better record) | – | Use this |
| Our call average of SP+, Elo and Our model | Alabama by 18.2 | Alabama 89% | Use this |
Each margin is from the same weekly ratings the team pages use: SP+ and Elo from their rating gap, the home team given 2.5 points (none at a neutral site); Our model is this site's experimental rating; Market is the margin the market expected before kickoff; ESPN FPI, SRS, Sagarin and Sonny Moore are rating gaps like SP+'s (each with its own home field), The Margin is that site's own model, and Record names the team with the better record (the home team on equal records). How these work ›
Matchup efficiency
Efficiency matchup · season to date · Vanderbilt 9 games, Alabama 9 games
Edge: Alabama wins 4 of 5
Alabama moves the ball better, stops plays better, is more disruptive and has the edge on big plays. Vanderbilt allows fewer big plays.
-
40% Moves the ballsuccessful plays ✓46%
-
44% Stops playssuccessful plays allowed ✓39%
-
15% Disruptionsacks, TFLs, turnovers ✓18%
-
1.30 Big playson offense ✓1.32
-
1.19✓ Big plays allowedon defense 1.26
Run game, head to head · season to date
Vanderbilt's runs work 38% of the time; Alabama's run defense allows 34%. Alabama's runs work 47% of the time; Vanderbilt's run defense allows 45%.
More numbers
| Measure | Vanderbilt | Alabama | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Off. success rate | 39.9% | 46.4% | Alabama |
| Off. explosiveness | 1.30 | 1.32 | Alabama |
| Def. success rate allowed | 43.9% | 38.9% | Alabama |
| Def. explosiveness allowed | 1.19 | 1.26 | Vanderbilt |
| Havoc created | 14.9% | 17.8% | Alabama |
- Run game, success rate: Vanderbilt offense 37.8% · Alabama defense allows 34.3% · edge: Alabama
- Run game, success rate: Alabama offense 47.3% · Vanderbilt defense allows 45.1% · edge: Alabama
- Run game, PPA per play: Vanderbilt offense +0.03 · Alabama defense allows -0.07 · edge: Alabama
- Run game, PPA per play: Alabama offense +0.14 · Vanderbilt defense allows +0.08 · edge: Alabama
- Success rate: how often a play does its job, gaining enough yards to keep the offense on schedule.
- Explosiveness: how big a team's successful plays are on average; a higher number means more big gains.
- Havoc: how often the defense blows up a play with a sack, a tackle for loss, a takeaway or a pass broken up.
- PPA (predicted points added): how many points an average play is worth to the offense; above zero is good for the offense, below zero good for the defense.
How to read this
- Each row compares the two teams on one measure of how well they have played this season, offense and defense, using every game so far with garbage time (plays late in a decided game) left out.
- The run game rows pair one team's rushing offense with the other's run defense. The row goes to whichever side is further from the FBS baseline this season, the offense by how far it runs above it, the defense by how much less it allows (baseline: run success rate 42%, PPA per play +0.07, the midpoint of what FBS offenses gain and FBS defenses allow, since both also play FCS teams), so two strong sides or two weak ones are judged by which is the more so. Edges within 3 points of success rate or 0.05 PPA are even. A strong run offense against a weak run defense is where a team can control the game on the ground.
- In the five rows at the top the longer bar is the better number: bars are scaled within each row, and in the two "allowed" rows the lower number gets the longer bar.
- Success rate is the share of plays that kept the offense on schedule (half the yards needed on first down, most of them on second, all of them on third or fourth). Explosiveness is how big the successful plays were, on average, in points. Havoc is the share of the opponent's snaps the defense wrecked: a tackle for loss, a sack, a takeaway or a pass broken up.
- "Allowed" rows are what each defense gave up, so the lower value wins.
- These are not adjusted for who each team has played, so a light schedule flatters a team, and early in the season they rest on very few games.
- Metrics explained: success rate, explosiveness and havoc ›
The prediction
All 10 models favor Alabama.
SP+ has Alabama by 21.7, Elo has Alabama by 15.1, Our model has Alabama by 17.9, ESPN FPI has Alabama by 22.9, SRS has Alabama by 25.4, Sagarin has Alabama by 16.6, Sonny Moore has Alabama by 24.5, The Margin has Alabama by 29.2, and Market has Alabama by 19.5. They are within 14.1 points of each other.
Latest (AI-assisted)
From the team pages' coverage of the last 72 hours: a starting quarterback, a player ruled out, suspended or dismissed, a coach change. Gathered by an AI model from public posts; not used in any number or injury status on this page. Verify against the linked sources.
Last 5 meetings
Alabama leads 64–19–4 · last: Alabama 30–14, 2025
| Season | Result | Site |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Alabama 30–14 | Bryant-Denny Stadium |
| 2024 | Vanderbilt 40–35 | FirstBank Stadium |
| 2022 | Alabama 55–3 | Bryant-Denny Stadium |
| 2017 | Alabama 59–0 | FirstBank Stadium |
| 2011 | Alabama 34–0 | Bryant-Denny Stadium |