The SportsWire

Michigan at #18Oregon

Prediction · week 11, 2026 · Sat Nov 14, 2:30 PM CT · FS1 · Autzen Stadium

Updated Tue Nov 10, 6:06 AM CT

Michigan5-4 · 2-4 Big Ten
Upcoming
#18 Oregon6-3 · 4-2 Big Ten · CFP #23

Sat Nov 14, 2:30 PM CT · FS1 · Autzen Stadium

Our call: Oregon by 10.0 · 74% pregame win chance

MICHMichigan · 5-4 Sat Nov 14, 2:30 PM CT OREOregon · 6-3

26%Our win chance74%

Our win chance: Oregon 74% · Michigan 26% · experimental, see how it is tested

Make your pick →

Model comparison

10 of 10 models favor Oregon

ModelSaysWin chanceUse this
Sonny Moore
Michigan +75.7 vs Oregon +94.2
Oregon by 22.4Oregon 95%Use this
SRS
Michigan +3.6 vs Oregon +16.5
Oregon by 15.4Oregon 87%Use this
Sagarin
Michigan +80.0 vs Oregon +90.7
Oregon by 13.3Oregon 83%Use this
ESPN FPI
Michigan +9.1 vs Oregon +19.7
Oregon by 13.1Oregon 83%Use this
The Margin
The Margin's model
Oregon by 12.7Oregon 82%Use this
Our model · experimental
Michigan +11.3 vs Oregon +19.9
Oregon by 11.1Oregon 79%Use this
Market
the market's pregame margin
Oregon by 9.5Oregon 75%Use this
SP+
Michigan +10.0 vs Oregon +16.9
Oregon by 9.4Oregon 75%Use this
Elo
Michigan 1677 vs Oregon 1849
Oregon by 9.4Oregon 75%Use this
Record
Oregon 6-3, Michigan 5-4
Oregon (better record)–Use this
Our call
average of SP+, Elo and Our model
Oregon by 10.0Oregon 74%Use this

Each margin is from the same weekly ratings the team pages use: SP+ and Elo from their rating gap, the home team given 2.5 points (none at a neutral site); Our model is this site's experimental rating; Market is the margin the market expected before kickoff; ESPN FPI, SRS, Sagarin and Sonny Moore are rating gaps like SP+'s (each with its own home field), The Margin is that site's own model, and Record names the team with the better record (the home team on equal records). How these work ›

Matchup efficiency

Efficiency matchup · season to date · Oregon 9 games, Michigan 9 games

Edge: Oregon wins 3 of 5

Oregon moves the ball better, is more disruptive and has the edge on big plays. Michigan stops plays better and allows fewer big plays.

Oregonlonger bar = betterMichigan
  • 40.3%✓ Moves the ballsuccessful plays 40.3%
  • 38% Stops playssuccessful plays allowed ✓34%
  • 16.5%✓ Disruptionsacks, TFLs, turnovers 16.2%
  • 1.36✓ Big playson offense 1.16
  • 1.29 Big plays allowedon defense ✓1.15

Run game, head to head · season to date

Oregon's runs work 40% of the time; Michigan's run defense allows 33%. Michigan's runs work 39% of the time; Oregon's run defense allows 38%.

More numbers
MeasureOregonMichiganEdge
Off. success rate40.3%40.3%Oregon
Off. explosiveness1.361.16Oregon
Def. success rate allowed37.8%33.9%Michigan
Def. explosiveness allowed1.291.15Michigan
Havoc created16.5%16.2%Oregon
  • Run game, success rate: Oregon offense 40.0% · Michigan defense allows 32.9% · edge: Michigan
  • Run game, success rate: Michigan offense 38.9% · Oregon defense allows 37.6% · edge: Oregon
  • Run game, PPA per play: Oregon offense -0.04 · Michigan defense allows -0.11 · edge: Michigan
  • Run game, PPA per play: Michigan offense +0.03 · Oregon defense allows +0.02 · edge: Oregon
  • Success rate: how often a play does its job, gaining enough yards to keep the offense on schedule.
  • Explosiveness: how big a team's successful plays are on average; a higher number means more big gains.
  • Havoc: how often the defense blows up a play with a sack, a tackle for loss, a takeaway or a pass broken up.
  • PPA (predicted points added): how many points an average play is worth to the offense; above zero is good for the offense, below zero good for the defense.

How to read this

  • Each row compares the two teams on one measure of how well they have played this season, offense and defense, using every game so far with garbage time (plays late in a decided game) left out.
  • The run game rows pair one team's rushing offense with the other's run defense. The row goes to whichever side is further from the FBS baseline this season, the offense by how far it runs above it, the defense by how much less it allows (baseline: run success rate 42%, PPA per play +0.07, the midpoint of what FBS offenses gain and FBS defenses allow, since both also play FCS teams), so two strong sides or two weak ones are judged by which is the more so. Edges within 3 points of success rate or 0.05 PPA are even. A strong run offense against a weak run defense is where a team can control the game on the ground.
  • In the five rows at the top the longer bar is the better number: bars are scaled within each row, and in the two "allowed" rows the lower number gets the longer bar.
  • Success rate is the share of plays that kept the offense on schedule (half the yards needed on first down, most of them on second, all of them on third or fourth). Explosiveness is how big the successful plays were, on average, in points. Havoc is the share of the opponent's snaps the defense wrecked: a tackle for loss, a sack, a takeaway or a pass broken up.
  • "Allowed" rows are what each defense gave up, so the lower value wins.
  • These are not adjusted for who each team has played, so a light schedule flatters a team, and early in the season they rest on very few games.
  • Metrics explained: success rate, explosiveness and havoc ›

The prediction

All 10 models favor Oregon.

SP+ has Oregon by 9.4, Elo has Oregon by 9.4, Our model has Oregon by 11.1, ESPN FPI has Oregon by 13.1, SRS has Oregon by 15.4, Sagarin has Oregon by 13.3, Sonny Moore has Oregon by 22.4, The Margin has Oregon by 12.7, and Market has Oregon by 9.5. They are within 13.1 points of each other.

Latest (AI-assisted)

Michigan

From the team pages' coverage of the last 72 hours: a starting quarterback, a player ruled out, suspended or dismissed, a coach change. Gathered by an AI model from public posts; not used in any number or injury status on this page. Verify against the linked sources.

Last 5 meetings

tied 3–3 · last: Oregon 38–17, 2024 · Oregon has won 3 straight

SeasonResultSite
2024Oregon 38–17Michigan Stadium
2007Oregon 39–7Michigan Stadium
2003Oregon 31–27Autzen Stadium
1973Michigan 24–0—
1960Michigan 21–0—

Team pages