The SportsWire

#2Utah at #22Arizona

Prediction · week 11, 2026 · Sat Nov 14, Time TBA · Casino Del Sol Stadium

Updated Tue Nov 10, 6:06 AM CT

#2 Utah9-0 · 6-0 Big 12 · CFP #3
Upcoming
#22 Arizona7-2 · 4-2 Big 12 · CFP #22

Sat Nov 14, Time TBA · Casino Del Sol Stadium

Our call: Utah by 3.4 · 59% pregame win chance

UTAHUtah · 9-0 Sat Nov 14, Time TBA ARIZArizona · 7-2

59%Our win chance41%

Our win chance: Utah 59% · Arizona 41% · experimental, see how it is tested

Make your pick →

Model comparison

10 of 10 models favor Utah

ModelSaysWin chanceUse this
SRS
Utah +21.8 vs Arizona +13.7
Utah by 5.6Utah 66%Use this
Our model · experimental
Utah +17.0 vs Arizona +10.4
Utah by 4.2Utah 62%Use this
SP+
Utah +21.5 vs Arizona +15.4
Utah by 3.6Utah 60%Use this
ESPN FPI
Utah +18.7 vs Arizona +12.7
Utah by 3.5Utah 60%Use this
Sonny Moore
Utah +91.6 vs Arizona +84.3
Utah by 3.3Utah 59%Use this
The Margin
The Margin's model
Utah by 2.8Utah 58%Use this
Elo
Utah 1918 vs Arizona 1795
Utah by 2.4Utah 57%Use this
Sagarin
Utah +85.4 vs Arizona +80.7
Utah by 2.1Utah 56%Use this
Market
the market's pregame margin
Utah by 1.5Utah 54%Use this
Record
Arizona 7-2, Utah 9-0
Utah (better record)–Use this
Our call
average of SP+, Elo and Our model
Utah by 3.4Utah 59%Use this

Each margin is from the same weekly ratings the team pages use: SP+ and Elo from their rating gap, the home team given 2.5 points (none at a neutral site); Our model is this site's experimental rating; Market is the margin the market expected before kickoff; ESPN FPI, SRS, Sagarin and Sonny Moore are rating gaps like SP+'s (each with its own home field), The Margin is that site's own model, and Record names the team with the better record (the home team on equal records). How these work ›

Matchup efficiency

Efficiency matchup · season to date · Arizona 9 games, Utah 9 games

Edge: Utah wins 3 of 5

Utah moves the ball better, stops plays better and is more disruptive. Arizona has the edge on big plays and allows fewer big plays.

Arizonalonger bar = betterUtah
  • 46% Moves the ballsuccessful plays ✓50%
  • 37% Stops playssuccessful plays allowed ✓36%
  • 16% Disruptionsacks, TFLs, turnovers ✓17%
  • 1.31✓ Big playson offense 1.30
  • 1.33✓ Big plays allowedon defense 1.42

Run game, head to head · season to date

Arizona's runs work 43% of the time; Utah's run defense allows 39%. Utah's runs work 50% of the time; Arizona's run defense allows 38%.

More numbers
MeasureArizonaUtahEdge
Off. success rate45.8%50.4%Utah
Off. explosiveness1.311.30Arizona
Def. success rate allowed36.9%36.2%Utah
Def. explosiveness allowed1.331.42Arizona
Havoc created16.2%17.2%Utah
  • Run game, success rate: Arizona offense 42.9% · Utah defense allows 38.9% · edge: Utah
  • Run game, success rate: Utah offense 49.6% · Arizona defense allows 37.7% · edge: even
  • Run game, PPA per play: Arizona offense +0.10 · Utah defense allows -0.02 · edge: Utah
  • Run game, PPA per play: Utah offense +0.27 · Arizona defense allows +0.02 · edge: Utah
  • Success rate: how often a play does its job, gaining enough yards to keep the offense on schedule.
  • Explosiveness: how big a team's successful plays are on average; a higher number means more big gains.
  • Havoc: how often the defense blows up a play with a sack, a tackle for loss, a takeaway or a pass broken up.
  • PPA (predicted points added): how many points an average play is worth to the offense; above zero is good for the offense, below zero good for the defense.

How to read this

  • Each row compares the two teams on one measure of how well they have played this season, offense and defense, using every game so far with garbage time (plays late in a decided game) left out.
  • The run game rows pair one team's rushing offense with the other's run defense. The row goes to whichever side is further from the FBS baseline this season, the offense by how far it runs above it, the defense by how much less it allows (baseline: run success rate 42%, PPA per play +0.07, the midpoint of what FBS offenses gain and FBS defenses allow, since both also play FCS teams), so two strong sides or two weak ones are judged by which is the more so. Edges within 3 points of success rate or 0.05 PPA are even. A strong run offense against a weak run defense is where a team can control the game on the ground.
  • In the five rows at the top the longer bar is the better number: bars are scaled within each row, and in the two "allowed" rows the lower number gets the longer bar.
  • Success rate is the share of plays that kept the offense on schedule (half the yards needed on first down, most of them on second, all of them on third or fourth). Explosiveness is how big the successful plays were, on average, in points. Havoc is the share of the opponent's snaps the defense wrecked: a tackle for loss, a sack, a takeaway or a pass broken up.
  • "Allowed" rows are what each defense gave up, so the lower value wins.
  • These are not adjusted for who each team has played, so a light schedule flatters a team, and early in the season they rest on very few games.
  • Metrics explained: success rate, explosiveness and havoc ›

The prediction

All 10 models favor Utah.

SP+ has Utah by 3.6, Elo has Utah by 2.4, Our model has Utah by 4.2, ESPN FPI has Utah by 3.5, SRS has Utah by 5.6, Sagarin has Utah by 2.1, Sonny Moore has Utah by 3.3, The Margin has Utah by 2.8, and Market has Utah by 1.5. They are within 4.1 points of each other.

Last 5 meetings

Utah leads 26–21–2 · last: Arizona 23–10, 2024 · Arizona has won 2 straight

SeasonResultSite
2024Arizona 23–10Rice-Eccles Stadium
2023Arizona 42–18Arizona Stadium
2022Utah 45–20Rice-Eccles Stadium
2021Utah 38–29Arizona Stadium
2019Utah 35–7Arizona Stadium

Team pages