·
Sat Oct 31, 3:15 PM CT · Beaver Stadium
20%Our win chance80%
Our win chance: Penn State 80% · Purdue 20% · experimental, see how it is tested
Kickoff corrected (source: purduesports.com, checked Oct 21, 2026).
Model comparison
9 of 9 models favor Penn State
| Model | Says | Win chance |
|---|---|---|
| SP+ Purdue -0.1 vs Penn State +7.3 · week 8 ratings | Penn State by 9.9 | Penn State 76% |
| Elo Purdue 1423 vs Penn State 1800 | Penn State by 17.6 | Penn State 90% |
| Our model · experimental no snapshot for this game | n/a | – |
| ESPN FPI Purdue +1.9 vs Penn State +11.7 | Penn State by 12.4 | Penn State 81% |
| SRS Purdue +3.6 vs Penn State +4.9 | Penn State by 3.8 | Penn State 61% |
| Sagarin Purdue +74.4 vs Penn State +80.9 | Penn State by 10.3 | Penn State 77% |
| Sonny Moore Purdue +70.9 vs Penn State +73.4 | Penn State by 6.5 | Penn State 68% |
| The Margin The Margin's model | Penn State by 17.1 | Penn State 89% |
| Record Penn State 3-4, Purdue 3-4 | Penn State (better record) | – |
| Market the market's pregame margin | Penn State by 7.5 | Penn State 71% |
Each margin is from the same weekly ratings the team pages use: SP+ and Elo from their rating gap, the home team given 2.5 points (none at a neutral site); Our model is this site's experimental rating; Market is the margin the market expected before kickoff; ESPN FPI, SRS, Sagarin and Sonny Moore are rating gaps like SP+'s (each with its own home field), The Margin is that site's own model, and Record names the team with the better record (the home team on equal records). How these work ›
Matchup efficiency
Efficiency matchup · season to date · Penn State 7 games, Purdue 7 games
Edge: Penn State wins 3 of 5
Penn State stops plays better, is more disruptive and allows fewer big plays. Purdue moves the ball better and has the edge on big plays.
-
40% Moves the ballsuccessful plays ✓45%
-
40%✓ Stops playssuccessful plays allowed 47%
-
17%✓ Disruptionsacks, TFLs, turnovers 15%
-
1.24 Big playson offense ✓1.28
-
1.30✓ Big plays allowedon defense 1.37
Run game, head to head · season to date
Penn State's runs work 37% of the time; Purdue's run defense allows 49%. Purdue's runs work 42% of the time; Penn State's run defense allows 43%.
More numbers
| Measure | Penn State | Purdue | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Off. success rate | 40.4% | 45.2% | Purdue |
| Off. explosiveness | 1.24 | 1.28 | Purdue |
| Def. success rate allowed | 40.2% | 47.2% | Penn State |
| Def. explosiveness allowed | 1.30 | 1.37 | Penn State |
| Havoc created | 17.3% | 14.8% | Penn State |
- Run game, success rate: Penn State offense 37.1% · Purdue defense allows 48.9% · edge: even
- Run game, success rate: Purdue offense 42.4% · Penn State defense allows 43.0% · edge: even
- Run game, PPA per play: Penn State offense -0.04 · Purdue defense allows +0.20 · edge: even
- Run game, PPA per play: Purdue offense +0.08 · Penn State defense allows +0.25 · edge: Purdue
- Success rate: how often a play does its job, gaining enough yards to keep the offense on schedule.
- Explosiveness: how big a team's successful plays are on average; a higher number means more big gains.
- Havoc: how often the defense blows up a play with a sack, a tackle for loss, a takeaway or a pass broken up.
- PPA (predicted points added): how many points an average play is worth to the offense; above zero is good for the offense, below zero good for the defense.
How to read this
- Each row compares the two teams on one measure of how well they have played this season, offense and defense, using every game so far with garbage time (plays late in a decided game) left out.
- The run game rows pair one team's rushing offense with the other's run defense. The row goes to whichever side is further from the FBS baseline this season, the offense by how far it runs above it, the defense by how much less it allows (baseline: run success rate 43%, PPA per play +0.08, the midpoint of what FBS offenses gain and FBS defenses allow, since both also play FCS teams), so two strong sides or two weak ones are judged by which is the more so. Edges within 3 points of success rate or 0.05 PPA are even. A strong run offense against a weak run defense is where a team can control the game on the ground.
- In the five rows at the top the longer bar is the better number: bars are scaled within each row, and in the two "allowed" rows the lower number gets the longer bar.
- Success rate is the share of plays that kept the offense on schedule (half the yards needed on first down, most of them on second, all of them on third or fourth). Explosiveness is how big the successful plays were, on average, in points. Havoc is the share of the opponent's snaps the defense wrecked: a tackle for loss, a sack, a takeaway or a pass broken up.
- "Allowed" rows are what each defense gave up, so the lower value wins.
- These are not adjusted for who each team has played, so a light schedule flatters a team, and early in the season they rest on very few games.
- Metrics explained: success rate, explosiveness and havoc ›
The prediction
All 9 models favor Penn State (SP+ from the week 8 snapshot).
Our call posts Monday when this week's ratings are set.
SP+ has Penn State by 9.9, Elo has Penn State by 17.6, ESPN FPI has Penn State by 12.4, SRS has Penn State by 3.8, Sagarin has Penn State by 10.3, Sonny Moore has Penn State by 6.5, The Margin has Penn State by 17.1, and Market has Penn State by 7.5. They are within 13.8 points of each other.
Last 5 meetings
Penn State leads 17–3–1 · last: Penn State 49–10, 2024 · Penn State has won 11 straight
| Season | Result | Site |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Penn State 49–10 | Ross-Ade Stadium |
| 2022 | Penn State 35–31 | Ross-Ade Stadium |
| 2019 | Penn State 35–7 | Beaver Stadium |
| 2016 | Penn State 62–24 | Ross-Ade Stadium |
| 2013 | Penn State 45–21 | Beaver Stadium |