The SportsWire

#6Utah at Cincinnati

Prediction · week 9, 2026 · Sat Oct 31, 2:45 PM CT · Nippert Stadium

Updated Sun Oct 25, 5:13 PM CT

#6Utah7-0
Upcoming
Cincinnati4-2

Sat Oct 31, 2:45 PM CT · Nippert Stadium

UTAHUtah · 7-0 Sat Oct 31, 2:45 PM CT CINCincinnati · 4-2

79%Our win chance21%

Our win chance: Utah 79% · Cincinnati 21% · experimental, see how it is tested

Model comparison

9 of 9 models favor Utah

ModelSaysWin chance
SP+
Utah +19.4 vs Cincinnati +5.2 · week 8 ratings
Utah by 11.7Utah 80%
Elo
Utah 1896 vs Cincinnati 1532
Utah by 12.1Utah 81%
Our model · experimental
no snapshot for this game
n/a–
ESPN FPI
Utah +17.4 vs Cincinnati +3.5
Utah by 11.4Utah 80%
SRS
Utah +18.5 vs Cincinnati +3.3
Utah by 12.7Utah 82%
Sagarin
Utah +83.2 vs Cincinnati +71.8
Utah by 7.6Utah 71%
Sonny Moore
Utah +90.3 vs Cincinnati +70.6
Utah by 15.7Utah 87%
The Margin
The Margin's model
Utah by 11.8Utah 80%
Record
Cincinnati 4-2, Utah 7-0
Utah (better record)–
Market
the market's pregame margin
Utah by 6.5Utah 68%

Each margin is from the same weekly ratings the team pages use: SP+ and Elo from their rating gap, the home team given 2.5 points (none at a neutral site); Our model is this site's experimental rating; Market is the margin the market expected before kickoff; ESPN FPI, SRS, Sagarin and Sonny Moore are rating gaps like SP+'s (each with its own home field), The Margin is that site's own model, and Record names the team with the better record (the home team on equal records). How these work ›

Matchup efficiency

Efficiency matchup · season to date · Cincinnati 6 games, Utah 7 games

Edge: Utah wins 3 of 5

Utah moves the ball better, stops plays better and is more disruptive. Cincinnati has the edge on big plays and allows fewer big plays.

Cincinnatilonger bar = betterUtah
  • 46% Moves the ballsuccessful plays ✓51%
  • 44% Stops playssuccessful plays allowed ✓36%
  • 17% Disruptionsacks, TFLs, turnovers ✓18%
  • 1.38✓ Big playson offense 1.27
  • 1.21✓ Big plays allowedon defense 1.33

Run game, head to head · season to date

Cincinnati's runs work 44% of the time; Utah's run defense allows 38%. Utah's runs work 49% of the time; Cincinnati's run defense allows 45%.

More numbers
MeasureCincinnatiUtahEdge
Off. success rate46.5%50.6%Utah
Off. explosiveness1.381.27Cincinnati
Def. success rate allowed44.4%35.6%Utah
Def. explosiveness allowed1.211.33Cincinnati
Havoc created16.8%18.0%Utah
  • Run game, success rate: Cincinnati offense 44.4% · Utah defense allows 37.6% · edge: Utah
  • Run game, success rate: Utah offense 48.8% · Cincinnati defense allows 45.3% · edge: Utah
  • Run game, PPA per play: Cincinnati offense +0.25 · Utah defense allows -0.04 · edge: Cincinnati
  • Run game, PPA per play: Utah offense +0.29 · Cincinnati defense allows +0.11 · edge: Utah
  • Success rate: how often a play does its job, gaining enough yards to keep the offense on schedule.
  • Explosiveness: how big a team's successful plays are on average; a higher number means more big gains.
  • Havoc: how often the defense blows up a play with a sack, a tackle for loss, a takeaway or a pass broken up.
  • PPA (predicted points added): how many points an average play is worth to the offense; above zero is good for the offense, below zero good for the defense.

How to read this

  • Each row compares the two teams on one measure of how well they have played this season, offense and defense, using every game so far with garbage time (plays late in a decided game) left out.
  • The run game rows pair one team's rushing offense with the other's run defense. The row goes to whichever side is further from the FBS baseline this season, the offense by how far it runs above it, the defense by how much less it allows (baseline: run success rate 43%, PPA per play +0.08, the midpoint of what FBS offenses gain and FBS defenses allow, since both also play FCS teams), so two strong sides or two weak ones are judged by which is the more so. Edges within 3 points of success rate or 0.05 PPA are even. A strong run offense against a weak run defense is where a team can control the game on the ground.
  • In the five rows at the top the longer bar is the better number: bars are scaled within each row, and in the two "allowed" rows the lower number gets the longer bar.
  • Success rate is the share of plays that kept the offense on schedule (half the yards needed on first down, most of them on second, all of them on third or fourth). Explosiveness is how big the successful plays were, on average, in points. Havoc is the share of the opponent's snaps the defense wrecked: a tackle for loss, a sack, a takeaway or a pass broken up.
  • "Allowed" rows are what each defense gave up, so the lower value wins.
  • These are not adjusted for who each team has played, so a light schedule flatters a team, and early in the season they rest on very few games.
  • Metrics explained: success rate, explosiveness and havoc ›

The prediction

All 9 models favor Utah (SP+ from the week 8 snapshot).

Our call posts Monday when this week's ratings are set.

SP+ has Utah by 11.7, Elo has Utah by 12.1, ESPN FPI has Utah by 11.4, SRS has Utah by 12.7, Sagarin has Utah by 7.6, Sonny Moore has Utah by 15.7, The Margin has Utah by 11.8, and Market has Utah by 6.5. They are within 9.2 points of each other.

Team pages