·
Sat Nov 14, 3:15 PM CT · BTN · Spartan Stadium
Our call: Washington by 6.9 · 68% pregame win chance
68%Our win chance32%
Our win chance: Washington 68% · Michigan State 32% · experimental, see how it is tested
Model comparison
8 of 10 models favor Washington
| Model | Says | Win chance | Use this |
|---|---|---|---|
| SP+ Washington +8.9 vs Michigan State -2.4 | Washington by 8.8 | Washington 74% | Use this |
| Elo Washington 1722 vs Michigan State 1487 | Washington by 6.9 | Washington 69% | Use this |
| Our model · experimental Washington +7.3 vs Michigan State -0.1 | Washington by 5 | Washington 64% | Use this |
| Market the market's pregame margin | Washington by 3.5 | Washington 60% | Use this |
| Sonny Moore Washington +76.5 vs Michigan State +75.4 | Michigan State by 2.9 | Michigan State 58% | Use this |
| Sagarin Washington +79.6 vs Michigan State +74.2 | Washington by 2.8 | Washington 58% | Use this |
| ESPN FPI Washington +6.6 vs Michigan State +2.2 | Washington by 1.9 | Washington 56% | Use this |
| The Margin The Margin's model | Washington by 1.4 | Washington 54% | Use this |
| SRS Washington +4.2 vs Michigan State +2.5 | Michigan State by 0.8 | Michigan State 52% | Use this |
| Record Michigan State 3-6, Washington 5-4 | Washington (better record) | – | Use this |
| Our call average of SP+, Elo and Our model | Washington by 6.9 | Washington 68% | Use this |
Each margin is from the same weekly ratings the team pages use: SP+ and Elo from their rating gap, the home team given 2.5 points (none at a neutral site); Our model is this site's experimental rating; Market is the margin the market expected before kickoff; ESPN FPI, SRS, Sagarin and Sonny Moore are rating gaps like SP+'s (each with its own home field), The Margin is that site's own model, and Record names the team with the better record (the home team on equal records). How these work ›
Matchup efficiency
Efficiency matchup · season to date · Michigan State 9 games, Washington 9 games
Edge: Washington wins 4 of 5
Washington moves the ball better, stops plays better, is more disruptive and has the edge on big plays. Michigan State allows fewer big plays.
-
41% Moves the ballsuccessful plays ✓42%
-
43% Stops playssuccessful plays allowed ✓39%
-
15% Disruptionsacks, TFLs, turnovers ✓19%
-
1.08 Big playson offense ✓1.21
-
1.18✓ Big plays allowedon defense 1.25
Run game, head to head · season to date
Michigan State's runs work 39% of the time; Washington's run defense allows 39%. Washington's runs work 41% of the time; Michigan State's run defense allows 45%.
More numbers
| Measure | Michigan State | Washington | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Off. success rate | 40.8% | 42.0% | Washington |
| Off. explosiveness | 1.08 | 1.21 | Washington |
| Def. success rate allowed | 43.4% | 39.3% | Washington |
| Def. explosiveness allowed | 1.18 | 1.25 | Michigan State |
| Havoc created | 14.8% | 18.7% | Washington |
- Run game, success rate: Michigan State offense 39.4% · Washington defense allows 39.1% · edge: Washington
- Run game, success rate: Washington offense 40.6% · Michigan State defense allows 45.0% · edge: even
- Run game, PPA per play: Michigan State offense -0.06 · Washington defense allows -0.02 · edge: Washington
- Run game, PPA per play: Washington offense +0.00 · Michigan State defense allows +0.06 · edge: Michigan State
- Success rate: how often a play does its job, gaining enough yards to keep the offense on schedule.
- Explosiveness: how big a team's successful plays are on average; a higher number means more big gains.
- Havoc: how often the defense blows up a play with a sack, a tackle for loss, a takeaway or a pass broken up.
- PPA (predicted points added): how many points an average play is worth to the offense; above zero is good for the offense, below zero good for the defense.
How to read this
- Each row compares the two teams on one measure of how well they have played this season, offense and defense, using every game so far with garbage time (plays late in a decided game) left out.
- The run game rows pair one team's rushing offense with the other's run defense. The row goes to whichever side is further from the FBS baseline this season, the offense by how far it runs above it, the defense by how much less it allows (baseline: run success rate 42%, PPA per play +0.07, the midpoint of what FBS offenses gain and FBS defenses allow, since both also play FCS teams), so two strong sides or two weak ones are judged by which is the more so. Edges within 3 points of success rate or 0.05 PPA are even. A strong run offense against a weak run defense is where a team can control the game on the ground.
- In the five rows at the top the longer bar is the better number: bars are scaled within each row, and in the two "allowed" rows the lower number gets the longer bar.
- Success rate is the share of plays that kept the offense on schedule (half the yards needed on first down, most of them on second, all of them on third or fourth). Explosiveness is how big the successful plays were, on average, in points. Havoc is the share of the opponent's snaps the defense wrecked: a tackle for loss, a sack, a takeaway or a pass broken up.
- "Allowed" rows are what each defense gave up, so the lower value wins.
- These are not adjusted for who each team has played, so a light schedule flatters a team, and early in the season they rest on very few games.
- Metrics explained: success rate, explosiveness and havoc ›
The prediction
SP+, Elo, Our model, ESPN FPI, Sagarin, The Margin, Record and Market favor Washington; SRS and Sonny Moore favor Michigan State.
SP+ has Washington by 8.8, Elo has Washington by 6.9, Our model has Washington by 5.0, ESPN FPI has Washington by 1.9, SRS has Michigan State by 0.8, Sagarin has Washington by 2.8, Sonny Moore has Michigan State by 2.9, The Margin has Washington by 1.4, and Market has Washington by 3.5. The furthest apart are 11.7 points from each other.
Last 5 meetings
Washington leads 4–1 · last: Washington 41–7, 2023 · Washington has won 4 straight
| Season | Result | Site |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Washington 41–7 | Spartan Stadium |
| 2022 | Washington 39–28 | Husky Stadium |
| 1997 | Washington 51–23 | neutral site |
| 1970 | Washington 42–16 | — |
| 1969 | Michigan State 27–11 | — |