·
Sat Oct 31, 7:00 PM CT · Memorial Stadium (Lincoln, NE)
32%Our win chance68%
Our win chance: Nebraska 68% · Washington 32% · experimental, see how it is tested
Kickoff corrected (source: huskers.com, checked Oct 21, 2026).
Model comparison
9 of 9 models favor Nebraska
| Model | Says | Win chance |
|---|---|---|
| SP+ Washington +8.2 vs Nebraska +15.6 · week 8 ratings | Nebraska by 9.9 | Nebraska 76% |
| Elo Washington 1704 vs Nebraska 1767 | Nebraska by 5.0 | Nebraska 64% |
| Our model · experimental no snapshot for this game | n/a | – |
| ESPN FPI Washington +4.7 vs Nebraska +17.1 | Nebraska by 14.9 | Nebraska 86% |
| SRS Washington +0.6 vs Nebraska +16.7 | Nebraska by 18.6 | Nebraska 91% |
| Sagarin Washington +78.2 vs Nebraska +84.0 | Nebraska by 9.6 | Nebraska 76% |
| Sonny Moore Washington +72.7 vs Nebraska +83.3 | Nebraska by 14.6 | Nebraska 85% |
| The Margin The Margin's model | Nebraska by 11.9 | Nebraska 80% |
| Record Nebraska 5-2, Washington 4-3 | Nebraska (better record) | – |
| Market the market's pregame margin | Nebraska by 8.5 | Nebraska 73% |
Each margin is from the same weekly ratings the team pages use: SP+ and Elo from their rating gap, the home team given 2.5 points (none at a neutral site); Our model is this site's experimental rating; Market is the margin the market expected before kickoff; ESPN FPI, SRS, Sagarin and Sonny Moore are rating gaps like SP+'s (each with its own home field), The Margin is that site's own model, and Record names the team with the better record (the home team on equal records). How these work ›
Matchup efficiency
Efficiency matchup · season to date · Nebraska 7 games, Washington 7 games
Edge: Nebraska wins 4 of 5
Nebraska moves the ball better, stops plays better, is more disruptive and has the edge on big plays. Washington allows fewer big plays.
-
44.3%✓ Moves the ballsuccessful plays 43.5%
-
34%✓ Stops playssuccessful plays allowed 40%
-
20%✓ Disruptionsacks, TFLs, turnovers 19%
-
1.41✓ Big playson offense 1.23
-
1.27 Big plays allowedon defense ✓1.22
Run game, head to head · season to date
Nebraska's runs work 45% of the time; Washington's run defense allows 39%. Washington's runs work 40% of the time; Nebraska's run defense allows 35%.
More numbers
| Measure | Nebraska | Washington | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| Off. success rate | 44.3% | 43.5% | Nebraska |
| Off. explosiveness | 1.41 | 1.23 | Nebraska |
| Def. success rate allowed | 33.9% | 39.7% | Nebraska |
| Def. explosiveness allowed | 1.27 | 1.22 | Washington |
| Havoc created | 19.6% | 18.7% | Nebraska |
- Run game, success rate: Nebraska offense 44.8% · Washington defense allows 38.9% · edge: even
- Run game, success rate: Washington offense 39.9% · Nebraska defense allows 34.9% · edge: Nebraska
- Run game, PPA per play: Nebraska offense +0.25 · Washington defense allows -0.07 · edge: even
- Run game, PPA per play: Washington offense +0.00 · Nebraska defense allows -0.03 · edge: Nebraska
- Success rate: how often a play does its job, gaining enough yards to keep the offense on schedule.
- Explosiveness: how big a team's successful plays are on average; a higher number means more big gains.
- Havoc: how often the defense blows up a play with a sack, a tackle for loss, a takeaway or a pass broken up.
- PPA (predicted points added): how many points an average play is worth to the offense; above zero is good for the offense, below zero good for the defense.
How to read this
- Each row compares the two teams on one measure of how well they have played this season, offense and defense, using every game so far with garbage time (plays late in a decided game) left out.
- The run game rows pair one team's rushing offense with the other's run defense. The row goes to whichever side is further from the FBS baseline this season, the offense by how far it runs above it, the defense by how much less it allows (baseline: run success rate 43%, PPA per play +0.08, the midpoint of what FBS offenses gain and FBS defenses allow, since both also play FCS teams), so two strong sides or two weak ones are judged by which is the more so. Edges within 3 points of success rate or 0.05 PPA are even. A strong run offense against a weak run defense is where a team can control the game on the ground.
- In the five rows at the top the longer bar is the better number: bars are scaled within each row, and in the two "allowed" rows the lower number gets the longer bar.
- Success rate is the share of plays that kept the offense on schedule (half the yards needed on first down, most of them on second, all of them on third or fourth). Explosiveness is how big the successful plays were, on average, in points. Havoc is the share of the opponent's snaps the defense wrecked: a tackle for loss, a sack, a takeaway or a pass broken up.
- "Allowed" rows are what each defense gave up, so the lower value wins.
- These are not adjusted for who each team has played, so a light schedule flatters a team, and early in the season they rest on very few games.
- Metrics explained: success rate, explosiveness and havoc ›
The prediction
All 9 models favor Nebraska (SP+ from the week 8 snapshot).
Our call posts Monday when this week's ratings are set.
SP+ has Nebraska by 9.9, Elo has Nebraska by 5.0, ESPN FPI has Nebraska by 14.9, SRS has Nebraska by 18.6, Sagarin has Nebraska by 9.6, Sonny Moore has Nebraska by 14.6, The Margin has Nebraska by 11.9, and Market has Nebraska by 8.5. They are within 13.6 points of each other.
Last 5 meetings
Nebraska leads 5–4–1 · last: Nebraska 51–38, 2011
| Season | Result | Site |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Nebraska 51–38 | Memorial Stadium (Lincoln, NE) |
| 2010 | Washington 19–7 | neutral site |
| 2010 | Nebraska 56–21 | Husky Stadium |
| 1998 | Nebraska 55–7 | — |
| 1997 | Nebraska 27–14 | — |